It all started going down hill when Matt Damon was chosen Sexiest Man Alive in 2007. Now People Magazine - the epitome of common sense & good taste (not!) - chooses Kate Hudson to grace the cover of their annual "100 Most Beautiful" issue. C'mon, Kate Hudson? She is alright looking but in no way worthy of the such privilege - and being on People's cover surely ain't one. Besides being a so-so actress, that if wasn't for her lineage would NEVER have gotten the foot in the door, she is just very...average. That's it, she is average. She is not a drop-dead gorgeous stunner like let's say Adriana Lima or an exotic beauty like Mila Kunis. She is just Goldie Hawn's daughter - plain and simple - and the only reason why she made the cover. Am I wrong?
My suggestions? Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Katherine Heigl, Kristen Bell, Salma Hayek, Hillary Swank, Angelina Jolie, Kristin Davis, Gabrielle Union, Cate Blanchett, Rihanna and the list goes on...
1 comment:
Oh, Pumpkin-Man, so naive. In Hollywood, whomever has the most powerful P.R. firm (and pays the most out to that P.R. firm) makes it up any list by periodicals like the one you have here and networks like E!...
No magazine or show actually calls and asks for anybody rather the P.R. firms are just scheduling, rotating and jockeying their clients on magazine covers, TV interview shows and etc..
If this were truly a "100 most beautiful" that list would look very very different.
Post a Comment